How about the outsourcing of the education program?

This thread is a long & interesting read
 
Yes this was an interesting thread. These are the experiences I went thru and I learned from them. Why the UAMCC leaders last year didnt want my imput when I went thru all that one can go thru. Most have no idea but Ron does. I offered to pay a whole side that wanted to question the ethics behind this and they accepted but the PWNA president back then which turned out to be Everett backed out from my offer. I tried to do the right thing and this whole thing ended up to be a mess. Power corrupts if not monitored.

This is why I was surprised the UAMCC didnt want me to get to inside. I like the truth and I spread the truth. IF we can all be honest working individuals without hidden agenda's then the sytem works. Man I wish the two power Mongers from these two org.s would have listen to reason.

Live and learn.
 
This is a great new decade! There are other new organization's to join. Why waste so much time and energy on the PWNA. WRAPI is up an coming, looking for members. The UAMCC is started and is looking for members, We have options... pick the best deal that you can find.
Click to expand...

Who would have known this would have turned out this Way?
 
It's funny the president of the UAMCC could make these statements

"If the PWNA board doesn't listen to members now, why should any prospective member choose to join? Should businessmen look for an organization that seems to say, "Join now, we want to make a difference, your opinion and good ethics are not required,"?

Two more quick points from earlier in this thread: First, a question to JohnT, a man I esteem as a police officer and a contributor here and elsewhere. If a person is found murdered, but nobody complains, or even if only a few people close to the situation complain, is the murderer any less guilty? No, and we all know it. The number of complainants has little bearing at all on whether or not ANY action is moral or ethical.

But yet a UAMCC BOD member that's violating state laws by operating without a license is okay with the UAMCC.


No wonder why so many BOD's and members are leaving the org. They can't even successfully give away free memberships.
 
Henry Bockman said:
It's funny the president of the UAMCC could make these statements

"If the PWNA board doesn't listen to members now, why should any prospective member choose to join? Should businessmen look for an organization that seems to say, "Join now, we want to make a difference, your opinion and good ethics are not required,"?

Two more quick points from earlier in this thread: First, a question to JohnT, a man I esteem as a police officer and a contributor here and elsewhere. If a person is found murdered, but nobody complains, or even if only a few people close to the situation complain, is the murderer any less guilty? No, and we all know it. The number of complainants has little bearing at all on whether or not ANY action is moral or ethical.

But yet a UAMCC BOD member that's violating state laws by operating without a license is okay with the UAMCC.


No wonder why so many BOD's and members are leaving the org. They can't even successfully give away free memberships.
Click to expand...

The Questions is was the Board member ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top