Clean County PW
Active member
Dang that was post #777 on this topic, why couldn't that been on a slot machine somewhere! Lol
You dawg... Good one David..lol
Dang that was post #777 on this topic, why couldn't that been on a slot machine somewhere! Lol
I wonder what Jerry,Paul K.,Pete,Russ Johnson, Bob from Pressure Tek.,Tom from ACR,John From Envirospec,Vinny from Industrial Equipment etc etc etc who can not be a part of helping contractors to deal with regulators.No inconsistency John. Distributors were unable to deal with or stop this onslaught on our industry. Some, because they were complicit, some because they were fooled.
2
I wonder what Jerry,Paul K.,Pete,Russ Johnson, Bob from Pressure Tek.,Tom from ACR,John From Envirospec,Vinny from Industrial Equipment etc etc etc who can not be a part of helping contractors to deal with regulators.
I think your wrong on this and also unfair to think that they should not be involved in any way shape or form.
It's there industry to...
I also think it's wrong the way you portray Robert and his son.
Will have to agree to disagree on this and all I can do is wish you luck cause your going to need it.
Thanks--- same to you as well Tony. GoodnightGood luck John.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
Thanks--- same to you as well Tony. Goodnight
http://www.gwinnettcounty.com/static/departments/publicutilities/pdf/WQ-01 Surface Cleaning.pdf
Lets Survey these contractors on your program ?
http://www.gwinnettcounty.com/porta...tection/IndustrialInspections/SurfaceCleaning
I'm curious to here from them
I thought the Contractor in question was a woman? She called the Mayor, City Council Members, everyone she could and narc-ed out other Contractors because she invested a bunch of money in reclaim equipment...that she may have not needed at all.
She didn't "Rat Out" other Contractors because of her love of the environment, she did it because a Distributor told her that if she bought all this reclaim equipment she would be the only Company able to clean compliantly and make a truck load of money.
Her company went out of business and she had to move out of town............Karma...................Then the "Powers That Be" Really Screwed It Up.
That whole situation could have been handled so much differently.
Nigel, I'm just doing the math on this. Billions! of auto-miles - This means oil, grease, antifreeze, brake dust etc, all on a substrate of tar. This source dwarfs others. Some good independent analysis of all the various runoffs would be great.
And Tom and Nigel, let's look at two examples of environmental cleaning:
1) Your Gas station Nigel, is cleaned monthly at a reasonable rate.
Each month the station is swept clean of garbage cigarette butts, etc, oils spots, transmission fluid, and coolant are dry cleaned with absorbent and placed in the trash.
Contaminant specific filters or booms filter the runoff.
The place is cleaned in a short time using only one small engine further reducing air contamination.
What little debris is left after filtering is dealt with by the built in system.
Fuel and labor costs are reduced. Customer is happy, his station is clean and his customers fuel up at a pleasant fuel pad.
You have a steady monthly income.
2) Your gas station is cleaned annually due to high cost.
The same pre-cleaning BMPs are used. But where the monthly cleanings provided 11 additional opportunities to collect debris, now the debris from cigarette butts to motor oil are left for rain events to wash off directly into the onsite treatment. The onsite treatment now has to deal with 11 more months of heavy, unfiltered runoff each month to further clog the system.
Cleaning takes much longer, is much harder to accomplish and will most certainly require soap or chems to get clean. Cleaning now requires more power equipment working near fuel pumps.
Stains are left longer making them harder or impossible to remove further making our industry look incompetent.
Additionally, you are working so infrequently it is easy for the customer to skip services, or hire someone else because he forgot who you are.
No steady income.
Onsite system clogged with more oil and debris and requires more often service.
Contractor appears ineffective.
Pads become filthy and look like a third world country.
Nigel, this is the real world effect that we are seeing in our travels around the country.
Option #1 is better for the contractor, the customer and the environment
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Pretty Interesting here the Water they Trap is good enough to clean with but not good enough to allow to go back into there system. ummm
This morning they told me that its designed for daily cleaning use.
This company exhibits at StormCon.com every year.
Why would your slide say no cleaning when the website and personal say yes?
Robert if we can't get you to talk about the incorrect info in your presentation whats the use?