I rarely get into these kind of threads as they simply seem to be two sides of an on-going argument and I don't enjoy the level of "passion" that seems to go along with them. I comment now, not to agree with Tony or to disagree, but to mention the Atlanta side as has been brought up in this thread. I was active with the issues about wash water discharge in the Gwinnett County area of Georgia when all the commotion started. I did work for a supply company that was an active PWNA member at the time. I would like to give my accounts of how that situation came about and was handled:
Gwinnett County had traced high levels of heavy metals; oils; and other pollutants in the storm water system directly back to the gas station Quick Trip located through-out the area. Because of this, the county storm water managment decided to target flat surface cleaning techniques. This started the ball rolling. The QT's quit cleaning their stations under the pressure. Many were concerned how this would effect their mobile cleaning business. I saw people come into the store who had received fines. It was quickly determined after speaking to the local reps that much misinformation existed and something needed to happen so that the regulations would be written fairly and responsibly. The County had contacted our store to find out what kind of solutions may be available to help in correcting what they wanted corrected. I personally did demos for them of many different ways reclaim could be done. I showed things like Pro vac systems to sump pumps with garden hoses and filter bags on the end to catch solid debris. All the methods were ok'ed once they saw how they worked and how they would keep wash water out of the storm drains. Then there were several meetings between the AHJ's and local companies that were PWNA members where the BMP's were discussed and started to be written. The PWNA members involvment was because they were interested in NOT having unjust regs being created; the wording was specific and precise; and because it was clear that many of the officials that were trying to fix the "problem" did not have all the facts. I never saw a situation that had our store being in a position to to create standards that would let us control what equipment would be needed to be "compliant". We did however land in a position to help a contractor have appropriate equipment to deal with these new directives. I personally discussed options with customers over the years that let them pick $10,000 equipment to $150 equipment depending on their needs and desires. Because of our involvment we had a unique perspective as to what the county wanted from the contractor and we could help the contractor stay out of trouble. So I must say here that what I originally saw happen here in GA was a direct result of the Gov. starting to create rules that would effect the working contractor and a united force stepped in and helped develop appropriate guidelines. While we may have sold a few vac systems in relation to this, the help we could give a contractor who was stumbling through all the new rules I believe actually helped many save money rather than spend more. Other areas also had similar troubles happening. About this time a drought was also happening in the south east so areas were trying to also limit water usage. Once again it took ACTIVE org members to go in and help local contractors continue to work by educating officials on how our industry operated and used water. And they were successful in helping contractors be able to continue having an income.
So I do not believe that the orgs set out to do harm in this arena. I have seen the help that orgs have done for this industry first-hand. Where this has gone from there is anyones guess. I do not condone pushing these BMP's in areas that have appropriate ones in place. I do support the work that ALL the orgs do to advance the pressure washing industry. I think that the intentions are GOOD by our orgs as I have met many of the involved people over the years and everyone of them has led me to believe they are trying to make a difference. HOW that is being done does seem to be questionable at times.
I will also say the the leaders of these orgs have shown a very large lack of professionalism and tact in dealing with the controversial topic that is wash water control. These bannings and name callings and insinuations are of a level I have not seen in my over 15 years in this industry. What do you think these actions say to the newbies in the industry? Doesn't make an org or our industry look professional at all. Yet knowing the people involved, I understand their passions. We will forever have different opinions about this topic. I see more division than ever in our industry, not a working force that wants to make things better. I only hope that egos can be set aside and proffesional conduct is returned to our industry.
Remember the past, but lets work for a better future. I for one want our water ways to be kept clean. I believe there are ways for our industry to assist in this with out costing a contrator lots of money, or legislate every aspect of our work. It also will take a bit of effort from all to manage wash water to ensure we don't add to the problems that CAN be created due to our cleaning techniques. For these things that effect you, I appluade your digging, questions, and involvement of any org or action. If on the other hand, someones event or work area has nothing to do with you, let it be. We all have a right to be participants in this industry and even profit at it. We just don't have the right to adversly effect others livelihood in a negative way.
Get involved and be a positive influence and change will be a good thing! These are my thoughts. I certainly don't intend to chastise individuals. Rather I would like to point out where we have been, where we are and hopefully where we are going together.