RustyACE said:
David,
I don't care what IKECA does or doesn't do; requires or doesn't require.
Rusty
Much the same as we dont care what CHDCA does or doesn't do; requires or doesn't require.
RustyACE said:
CHDCA requires that the person doing the cleaning be certified.
It's only logical.
LOGICAL! How about an independent entity certifying exhaust cleaners THAT'S LOGICAL... Schools administer SAT's and GMT's etc but they dont write the test, they dont grade the test IT IS INDEPENDENT!
RustyACE said:
If I go to a hospital, I want more than just the Director of Nurses to be a Registered Nurse. I want every nurse that works on patients to be a Registered nurse.
Would you go to a hospital where they train people with no experience to be Doctors and Nurses and then certify them as qualified and then sell them the tools of thier trade and then go and solicit patients for them?
The points are this:
A) Even though NFPA says "...by a properly trained, qualified, and certified company or person(s) acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction..."
Some of the key words:
company or person(s) & acceptable to the AHJ
It is so very unlikely that any inspector (fire or insurance) will look at a well done job and tell the restaurant owner "Good job but unacceptable because your cleaner is not certified" Inspectors inspect for the intent of the code and certified is not further defined.
B) If inspectors had the time and money to pursue the issue of certified companies and persons only, the scrutiny would then be on the certification itself. Which certification is acceptable. Well historically all accepted certifications come from independent organizations (UL, FM, CE etc...) If a certification company is also training and selling and otherwise known as a commercial venture their credibility is suspect.
I am a member of IKECA but I have no intent on becoming IKECA certified, as I work with my local AHJ's, and in discussions on this very topic they all agree that certification (biased or not) has no value.