Hey folks, I've been scratching my head over this one lately. Last year I threw a bit of ETH into one of those pooled funds where everyone chips in and supposedly smart people handle the trades, but it felt kinda random who actually got to call the shots. So how does crowd-sourced reputation actually allocate control in a pooled crypto portfolio? Like, does better past performance give someone more say over the whole pot, or is it just vibes and who shouts loudest? I remember one cycle where a couple guys seemed to swing things hard, but then their picks tanked and nobody really explained why they had that much pull to begin with. Curious what you've seen or figured out about the mechanics behind it.