Deprecated: Optional parameter $tapatalkHead declared before required parameter $xfOriginData is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /var/www/vhosts/propowerwash.com/httpdocs/board/upload/src/addons/Tapatalk/Listener/Hook.php on line 205

Cfw Vs Wollmans

Tom Zahlman

New member
Have a customer who insists on a clear sealer, and was wondering which one would be better. Wollmans or cfw. Never realy worked with a clear before.

Thanks :D
 
Forget about CWF (in my opinion).

I prefer Cabot's for clear sealers...........but I dont use them very often at all. Only in situations where the homeowners association requires a clear.
 
CWF vs. Wolman

"IF" these are the only two choices I have I would only use the CWF-UV or the Wolman F&P in either case I would make sure the customer sees a test board or sample first as both products clear or natural tone appear darker on the average. Of the two I find Wolman to be a better product. If this were me though I would do as Mike says and use the Cabot 3000 Natural or look into their new Timber Oil Natural as I have had GREAT results with this product line. Hope that helps just my opinion.
 
Thanks for the replys

I gave my customer the choices and they wanted the CWF. The deck did turn out realy nice and they were happy with it. Will post some pics when I get them.

Thanks again:D
 
Back
Top