Scott Stone
New member
I think you are reading our neighborhood anarchist wrong, j.c. I think the real issue is that this cop really had no right to even be questioning the camera man. There was not even a hint of suspicion of him doing something illegal, so that the cop had no reasonable suspicion. Really, no one has to answer any questions from an LEO. It is in the constitution, somewhere, I think it is the 5th amendment. I am certain that the legal thing is not o beat down someone that legally refuses to answer a question.
Also, Vegas has a history of covering up for their police officers that are not necessarily choir boys, and they have been caught repeatedly. Even if this LEO is Lilly white and pure, because of the history, he is auomatically tainted by others actions. It is just the way it is.
Also, Vegas has a history of covering up for their police officers that are not necessarily choir boys, and they have been caught repeatedly. Even if this LEO is Lilly white and pure, because of the history, he is auomatically tainted by others actions. It is just the way it is.