Tony Shelton
BS Detector, Esquire
If this kind of technology was available to the Redcoats do you think the founding fathers would have been lobbying each other to keep it out of the hands of the people and only in the hands of the government?
What would the founding fathers have wanted?
- Thread starter Tony Shelton
- Start date
Christopher
Moderator
Soon we will have drones spying on drones spying on other drones while we will have drones attacking other drones.
It will be scary when we will have all kinds of weapons on the drones and then when the real lasers come out..............even more scary.
It will be scary when we will have all kinds of weapons on the drones and then when the real lasers come out..............even more scary.
Tony Shelton
BS Detector, Esquire
The founding fathers would be turning over in their graves if they thought the government had access to these weapons without allowing the public equal access.
That was the whole point of the constitution; to limit the power of government.
And from 1791 (when the bill of rights was ratified) to 1934 - when the first federal gun laws went into effect. We had 143 years of private citizens being allowed to own every single piece of equipment the military used. And yet, there was relative peace. (excepting when Lincoln destroyed the constitution)
If the men and women in Waco had this kind of technology maybe they would have had a fighting chance. If they did anything all they did was break regulatory rules regarding registration of guns. Yet they are dead. Including the children.
The 2nd amendment wasn't written so that we could hunt. That was a given. It was necessary for survival just like it is in parts of Alaska today.
The 2nd amendment wasn't written so that we could defend our homes. Domestic crime was almost unheard of in those days.
The reason for the second amendment was to give people like David Koresh and Randy Weaver at least a fighting chance. Just like Paul Revere, Daniel Morgan, James Monroe, George Washington and many others who simply wanted the government to leave them alone to determine their own personal affairs.
We need these drones.
We need them to combat the drones that will soon be peeking in our windows to demand that we relinquish our children because of our religious beliefs among thousands of other reasons.
That was the whole point of the constitution; to limit the power of government.
And from 1791 (when the bill of rights was ratified) to 1934 - when the first federal gun laws went into effect. We had 143 years of private citizens being allowed to own every single piece of equipment the military used. And yet, there was relative peace. (excepting when Lincoln destroyed the constitution)
If the men and women in Waco had this kind of technology maybe they would have had a fighting chance. If they did anything all they did was break regulatory rules regarding registration of guns. Yet they are dead. Including the children.
The 2nd amendment wasn't written so that we could hunt. That was a given. It was necessary for survival just like it is in parts of Alaska today.
The 2nd amendment wasn't written so that we could defend our homes. Domestic crime was almost unheard of in those days.
The reason for the second amendment was to give people like David Koresh and Randy Weaver at least a fighting chance. Just like Paul Revere, Daniel Morgan, James Monroe, George Washington and many others who simply wanted the government to leave them alone to determine their own personal affairs.
We need these drones.
We need them to combat the drones that will soon be peeking in our windows to demand that we relinquish our children because of our religious beliefs among thousands of other reasons.
Tony Shelton
BS Detector, Esquire
A hammer is a deadly weapon in the hands of a psychopathic killer.
Yet millions use hammers throughout our country without being the slightest bit inclined to murder with them.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
Yet millions use hammers throughout our country without being the slightest bit inclined to murder with them.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
Tony Shelton
BS Detector, Esquire
Any of us could kill more innocent people in 10 seconds with the trucks we drive everyday than one could kill with an AR-15 or a drone if that was the kind of people we were.
The founding fathers tried to ensure our right to defend ourselves. The current system of government tries to ensure that we cannot.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
The founding fathers tried to ensure our right to defend ourselves. The current system of government tries to ensure that we cannot.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
Kory
Member
Tony, I like guns for the pure fun of shotting them. I don't hunt much so why do I have guns. 2 reasons really. 1st and formost I will defend my family and constitution at all costs. 2nd shooting for sport is fun as hell. Target and clay shooting is a blast. I am going to start going to local pistol matches soon. Shooting is just plain fun. Guns are like tools every one has a purpose. In this case I would reach for my 12ga and some buck shot and blow that damn drone out of the air! You are right these government toys are getting out of control. We the people are getting fed up! It's always funny how people don't care till it affects them. We have an area that is "high crime" aka black neighborhood. They have installed cameras on all the light poles in the 8 block radius. Cops at a station watch a live feed and dispatch a car if there is a problem. Funny how the only problems they had before the lights was drugs and prostitution. Anyways minorities were not able to fight them putting the cameras up. If that was to happen in a white neighborhood people would be pissed and every state rep would hear about it. Sad part is its coming and fast so get your angry face ready white people.
"Red"
Graphic Designer
Sounds like more target practice to me.