This is why we are in trouble

Tony Shelton

Tony Shelton

BS Detector, Esquire
Can someone explain to me how we can rationalize the fact that lying to the police is a crime, lying to investigators (Martha Stewart) is a felony yet those entrusted to protect us (police, judges, elected officials and other public servants) are allowed to lie to us and about us resulting in countless losses of liberty and incarcerations?

It can't be fixed from the top. We have to fix it from the bottom by not putting up with it any more.

It can be fixed when those at the bottom of the power rung refuse to participate in it further.

 
I bet it would have been different if the guy was wearing Kufi.
 
Michael DeRose said:
Why do you have to lie? If you got nothing to hide then you don't have to lie. I did not watch the video.
Click to expand...

I agree with you. I hate liars. Especially lying public servants like this judge in the video. You really need to watch it. I await your critique.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
This is why we are in trouble.

Public servants are allowed to keep their jobs when they've proven their word isn't worth spit. It happens all the time. Especially within city councils, and county boards. The worst is the police who are kept safe in their jobs by their unions that back them even when they're convicted http://www.officer.com/news/10839655/ohio-unions-often-save-bad-cops

We, the people, have no choice in the matter. We can't vote the cops out like we can these judges. They are immune from any consequences.

The only hope is for REAL men within the departments to stand up and start purging the ranks.

There are other problems in this country that need to be tackled too. We have a guideline for what is right and what is wrong and it is much older than the constitution.

There is something wrong when a child can be ripped from his mother's womb for a couple of hundred dollars just because there's money to be made and sluts that need to get that thing out so they can get on with their selfish lives. If this offends you.....tough. Anyone can be forgiven for a sin, but there is no forgiveness where there is no remorse, and frankly, only the unashamed and unremoseful could be offended. And please don't bring up the old "rape" scenario. I and my two sisters were adopted. The waiting list for adoptions is up over two years in many places. It's just another excuse to keep the door of murder open in this country. Further, studies have shown that there are around 200 rape induced pregnancies in the country in a year......out of 6 million pregnancies and 1.5 million abortions.

Yet, while this murder is condoned, there are no consequences for a man stealing another man's wife (and children in many cases)

I know it is a two way street, but if I own a horse and you steal it by whistling at it and dropping corn on the ground in front of it, just because it comes to you doesn't mean it's yours now! Try that defense in court and see how it works. Husbands and wives are bought and paid for with a verbal and written contract. That contract has come to mean nothing in this country.

And the reason it means nothing is because divorce cases, along with all other kinds of cases come in front of worthless judges like the one in this video.
 
Wow good job. you found a bad apple. Look for the good ones and you will find them too.
 
The man's name is Adam M. Mueller AKA Ademo Freeman, one of the founders of CopBlock.org who is responsible for a lot of the videos depicting constitutional abuses by police. The Judge's name is Edward J. Burke of Keene, NH.

He was arrested on June 29 on charges of "Improper Influence". http://www.sentinelsource.com/news/...cle_7b9f4e30-d7a8-56cd-9f65-27b0e77a8157.html

Here is the legal definition of "Improper Influence" according to New Hampshire law -

I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he:
(a) Threatens any harm to a public servant, party official or voter with the purpose of influencing his action, decision, opinion, recommendation, nomination, vote or other exercise of discretion; or
(b) Privately addresses to any public servant who has or will have an official discretion in a judicial or administrative proceeding any representation, argument or other communication with the purpose of influencing that discretion on the basis of considerations other than those authorized by law; or
(c) Being a public servant or party official, fails to report to a law enforcement officer conduct designed to influence him in violation of subparagraph (a) or (b) hereof.
II. ""Harm'' means any disadvantage or injury, to person or property or pecuniary interest, including disadvantage or injury to any other person or entity in whose welfare the public servant, party official, or voter is interested, provided that harm shall not be construed to include the exercise of any conduct protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or any provision of the federal or state constitutions.

This law was put in place to prevent bribing or threatening judges into making court decisions. "Considerations other than those authorized by law" specifically means bribes and the statute goes on to specifically EXEMPT simply talking to someone as a means of "harm" when it adds the last underlined section above.

It's pretty simple and it is an outright abuse of power for a judge to try to stretch this into a means to lock up a citizen.

Here is the police report. The once the man was in custody the judge realized how stupid it would be to claim he was threatened when he clearly was not, so he went charge shopping and found "improper influence" to charge him with and said he "misspoke" when he said he was "threatened" http://www.pixiq.com/sites/default/files/mueller_adam_11_682_ar.pdf

And before anybody goes off on the issue of "these guys were jerks for wearing hats in the courtroom in the first place, I might remind you that the trial of William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania, was a talking point of the founders when they were authoring the constitution. When Jurors refused to convict Penn for the crime of publicly speaking about things against the king the judge imprisoned him anyway......for wearing a hat in the courtroom. http://www.shapirosher.com/pages/news/135/the-trial-of-william-penn

I can't find any conclusion to this case so I assume he is still out after a few days in jail and posting $5000 bail.

Since then, while investigating this case of excessive force http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/05/police-excessive-force-in_n_996223.html Adam was arrested again, this time for "wiretapping".

Adam is currently facing up to 21 years in prison and his case is going before the supreme court for making this video. He was charged with felony wire-tapping for recording the phone conversations. Contrast that with all the conversations TMZ puts out of celebrities talking stupid on the phone to their relatives. This is another clear case of misuse of power.


I'm sure there are plenty of boot lickers out there who love to see these activists "get what they deserve" for disrupting the courts and interfering with the police.

There were plenty of guys like that in 1774 also, they were called Tories. And thankfully the patriots forgave them after the revolution and allowed them to live peacefully among those who had fought and lost family members for the freedom the Tories lived to enjoy.

Maybe once we regain freedom again you boot lickers will be forgiven and will be able to enjoy true freedom again, as before, on the backs of real patriots who were willing to be imprisoned or die to gain it.
 
schrec said:
Wow good job. you found a bad apple. Look for the good ones and you will find them too.
Click to expand...

If the "good apples" cared one bit about what the "bad apples" were doing, I think they would step in and do something about it, but they don't.

This happened about a year and a half ago. The guy was put in JAIL for 5 days for wearing a hat. Where were the "good apples" then?


Resource: http://www.copblock.org/5464/freebea/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top