The End Of The World ?

Apple Roof Cleaning

Roof Cleaning Instructor
John Bolton: Russia's Loading of Nuke Fuel Into Iran Plant Means Aug. 21 Deadline for Israeli Attack

<embed flashvars="playerVars=showStats=no|autoPlay=no|videoTitle=World War 3 - Israel, Iran, And Russia." src="http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/292075/world_war_3_israel_iran_and_russia.swf" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" name="Metacafe_292075" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="272" width="440">
World War 3 - Israel, Iran, And Russia. - The best video clips are here



Friday, 13 Aug 2010 01:41 PM
Article Font Size

By: David A. Patten
News that Russia will load nuclear fuel rods into an Iranian reactor has touched off a countdown to a point of no return, a deadline by which Israel would have to launch an attack on Iran's Bushehr reactor before it becomes effectively "immune" to any assault, says former Bush administration U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton.

Once the fuel rods are loaded, Bolton told Fox News on Friday afternoon, "it makes it essentially immune from attack by Israel. Because once the rods are in the reactor an attack on the reactor risks spreading radiation in the air, and perhaps into the water of the Persian Gulf."

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin declared in March that Russia would start the Bushehr reactor this summer. But the announcement from a spokesman for Russia's state atomic agency to Reuters Friday sent international diplomats scrambling to head off a crisis.

The story immediately became front-page news in Israel, which has laid precise plans to carry out an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities while going along with President Obama's plans to use international sanctions and diplomatic persuasion to convince Iran's clerics not to go nuclear.

Bolton made it clear that it is widely assumed that any Israeli attack on the Bushehr reactor must take place before the reactor is loaded with fuel rods.

"If they're going to do it that's the window that they have," Bolton declared. "Otherwise as I said before, once the rods are in the reactor, if you attack the reactor you're going to open it up and radiation will escape at least into the atmosphere and possibly into the waters of the Persian Gulf.

"So most people think that neither Israel nor the United States, come to that, would attack the reactor after it's been fueled."

Bolton cited the 1981 Israeli attack on Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor outside Baghdad and the September 2007 Israeli attack on a North Korean reactor being built in Syria. Both of those strikes came before fuel rods were loaded into those reactors.

"So if it's going to happen in Bushehr it has to happen before the fuel rods go in," Bolton said.

The conversation that touched off the de facto deadline for Israeli military action was a telephone conversation with wire services involving Sergei Novikov, a spokesman for Rosatom, the Russian Energy State Nuclear Corp.

Novikov said: "The fuel will be loaded on Aug 21. This is the start of the physical launch” of the reactor.

"From that moment the Bushehr plant will be officially considered a nuclear-energy installation," Novikov said, adding that the head of Rosatom, Sergei Kiriyenko, will visit Bushehr Aug. 21 to conduct a ceremony for the event.
According to Bolton, once the reactor is operational, it is only a matter of time before it begins producing plutonium that could be used in a nuclear weapon.

"And in the normal operation of this reactor, in just a fairly short period of time, you could get substantial amounts of plutonium to use as nuclear weapons," Bolton told Fox.

Russia, which is operating under a $1 billion contract with Iran, has spent more than a decade building the reactor. If Russia moves forward with its plan to fuel the reactor, it could be seen as a major setback to the Obama administration's strategy of engaging Russian leaders in order to win their cooperation.

"The U.S. urged them not to send the Iranian's fuel rods," Bolton said. "They did that. The Obama administration has urged them not to insert the fuel rods in the reactors, but as they've just announced that will begin next week. What that does over time is help Iran get another route to nuclear weapons through the plutonium they could reprocess out of the spent fuel rods."

The developments mean Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu soon may face a stark choice: Attack the Bushehr reactor in the next 8 days, or allow it to become operational despite the certainty it would greatly enhance Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.

Russian leaders have said the Bushehr reactor project is being closely monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog group. According to Iran's ISNA news agency, IAEA inspectors will be on hand to observe the fuel-rod loading process that is now scheduled to begin Aug. 21.

According to Russian officials, Iran has promised in writing to send all spent fuel rods from Bushehr back to Russia for reprocessing, to ensure they cannot be used for nuclear weapons.


Bolton said the reactor has been "a hole" in American foreign policy for over a decade.

The failure to demand it be shut down began in the Bush years, he said, and continues with the Obama administration "under what I believe is the mistaken theory that Iran is entitled to the peaceful use of nuclear energy."

"I don't think Iran is entitled to that, or I don't think we ought to allow it to happen, because they're manifestly violating any number of obligations under the non-proliferation treaty not to seek nuclear weapons. But this has been a hole in American policy for some number of years, and Iran and Russia are obviously exploiting it," Bolton said.

Russia’s move would put Iran "in a much better position overall," he said, adding, "I think this is a very delicate point, as I say, it closes off to the Israelis one possible target for pre-emptive military action.

U.N. sanctions against Iran, he said, "have not had and will not have any material effect on Iran's push to have deliverable nuclear weapons."

<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RuVMO1u8sE4?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RuVMO1u8sE4?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>
 
if that happens i may not be pressure washing for a while i may get a vacation compliments of uncle sam GO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
 
if that happens i may not be pressure washing for a while i may get a vacation compliments of uncle sam GO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
It's looking pretty scary. Israel attacks Iran, Russia attacks Israel, we get drug into it, very scary.
 
comeon guys do you think Obama would let them get a nuke if it were gonna be use or something other than energy? I almost got that all tipped out befor I puked.
 
We have just as much to worry about as Isreal. Once they have the capability to make a nuclear bomb the whole world is at risk. This country is run by a lunatic who has openly admitted the extermination of Isreal. This also gives them the capability to make some small but deadly dirty bombs that can be smuggled into our country with ease.

I say NUKE THEM !! GO ISREAL !! If they threaten us then we can go in with full force, and we already have a huge prescence in the area.
 
this should be an alert to the world to ask your self? Have I made preperations to stand before God. Jesus loves the world he died was buried and was raised from the dead so that we could be saved. Romans 10:9-13 many laugh at this but that does not change the truth we must be born again thanx
 
We have just as much to worry about as Isreal. Once they have the capability to make a nuclear bomb the whole world is at risk. This country is run by a lunatic who has openly admitted the extermination of Isreal. This also gives them the capability to make some small but deadly dirty bombs that can be smuggled into our country with ease.

I say NUKE THEM !! GO ISREAL !! If they threaten us then we can go in with full force, and we already have a huge prescence in the area.

We COULD go in with full force, but wont. Too many "civilians" would die. We would end up doing the bare minimum to reduce the damage to american lives.
 
We will not be drug in our Great Pres don't care about Israel
Oh yeah, if Russia attacks Israel, we sure will be drawn in.
 
We have just as much to worry about as Isreal. Once they have the capability to make a nuclear bomb the whole world is at risk. This country is run by a lunatic who has openly admitted the extermination of Isreal. This also gives them the capability to make some small but deadly dirty bombs that can be smuggled into our country with ease.

I say NUKE THEM !! GO ISREAL !! If they threaten us then we can go in with full force, and we already have a huge prescence in the area.

Israel's Netanyahu Poised to Take Out Iran's Nuclear Sites

Monday, 16 Aug 2010 09:43 AM
Article Font Size

By: George Will
When Israel declared independence in 1948, it had to use mostly small arms to repel attacks by six Arab armies. Today, however, Israel feels, and is, more menaced than it was then, or has been since. Hence the potentially world-shaking decision that will be made here, probably within two years.

To understand the man who will make it, begin with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's belief that stopping Iran's nuclear weapons program is integral to stopping the worldwide campaign to reverse 1948. It is, he says, a campaign to "put the Jew back to the status of a being that couldn't defend himself — a perfect victim."

Today's Middle East, he says, reflects two developments. One is the rise of Iran and militant Islam since the 1979 revolution, which led to al-Qaida, Hamas, and Hezbollah. The other development is the multiplying threat of missile warfare.

Now Israel faces a third threat, the campaign to delegitimize it in order to extinguish its capacity for self-defense.

After two uniquely perilous millennia for Jews, the creation of Israel meant, Netanyahu says, "the capacity for self-defense restored to the Jewish people." But note, he says, the reflexive worldwide chorus of condemnation when Israel responded with force to rocket barrages from Gaza and from southern Lebanon. There is, he believes, a crystallizing consensus that "Israel is not allowed to exercise self-defense."

From 1948 through 1973, he says, enemies tried to "eliminate Israel by conventional warfare." Having failed, they tried to demoralize and paralyze Israel with suicide bombers and other terrorism. "We put up a fence," Netanyahu says. "Now they have rockets that go over the fence." Israel's military, which has stressed offense as a solution to the nation's lack of strategic depth, now stresses missile defense.

That, however, cannot cope with Hamas' tens of thousands of rockets in Gaza and Hezbollah's 60,000 in southern Lebanon. There, U.N. resolution 1701, promulgated after the 2006 war, has been predictably farcical. This was supposed to inhibit the arming of Hezbollah and prevent its operations south of the Litani River.

Since 2006, Hezbollah's rocket arsenal has tripled and its operations mock resolution 1701. Hezbollah, learning from Hamas, now places rockets near schools and hospitals, certain that Israel's next response to indiscriminate aggression will turn the world media into a force multiplier for the aggressors.

Any Israeli self-defense anywhere is automatically judged "disproportionate." Israel knows this as it watches Iran.

Last year was Barack Obama's wasted year of "engaging" Iran. This led to sanctions that are unlikely to ever become sufficiently potent. With Russia, China, and Turkey being uncooperative, Iran is hardly "isolated." The Iranian democracy movement probably cannot quickly achieve regime change. It took Solidarity 10 years to do so against a Polish regime less brutally repressive than Iran's.

Hillary Clinton's words about extending a "defense umbrella over the region" imply, to Israelis, fatalism about a nuclear Iran. As for deterrence working against a nuclear-armed regime steeped in an ideology of martyrdom, remember: In 1980, Ayatollah Khomeini said: "We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world."

You say, that was long ago? Israel says, this is now:

Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, says Israel is the "enemy of God." Tehran, proclaiming that the Holocaust never happened and vowing to complete it, sent an ambassador to Poland who in 2006 wanted to measure the ovens at Auschwitz to prove them inadequate for genocide. Iran's former president, Hashemi Rafsanjani, who is considered a "moderate" by people for whom believing is seeing, calls Israel a "one-bomb country."

If Iran were to "wipe the Zionist entity off the map," as it vows to do, it would, Netanyahu believes, achieve a regional "dominance not seen since Alexander." Netanyahu does not say Israel will, if necessary, act alone to prevent this. Or does he?

He says CIA Director Leon Panetta is "about right" in saying Iran can be a nuclear power in two years. He says 1948 meant this: "For the first time in 2,000 years, a sovereign Jewish people could defend itself against attack." And he says: "The tragic history of the powerlessness of our people explains why the Jewish people need a sovereign power of self-defense." If Israel strikes Iran, the world will not be able to say it was not warned.
 
Can't trust any of them, least trustworthy of them all is Israel.
 
Sorry, I have to disagree with you Lou. Name one predominantly muslim country, besides Egypt, but including Hamas and Hezbollah, since they are defacto governments, who has honored a commitment in regards to Israel, or the beloved UN. In my opinion, there isn't one. They have built nuclear plants when they promised not to. They have dishonored peace treaties in regards to Israel and done everything in their power to eradicate Israel, including bombing schools and citizens, in the name of Allah. They have refused to negotiate, or when they have negotiated, and set terms, and Israel or someone else has met them, they say that they want more. The Muslim world is not about negotiation. It is about domination. If you don't join with them, in their religion, or if you choose to leave their religion, their laws allow your murder. I do not know how you could possible trust a group like that.
 
Sorry, I have to disagree with you Lou.

On June 8, 1967, US Navy intelligence ship USS Liberty was suddenly and brutally attacked on the high seas in international waters by the air and naval forces of Israel. The Israeli forces attacked with full knowledge that this was an American ship and lied about it. Survivors have been forbidden for 40 years to tell their story under oath to the American public. The USS Liberty Memorial web site tells their story and is dedicated to the memory of the 34 brave men who died.
more.....

I'm just saying I don't trust ANY of them.......meaning from the whole region.
 
I know about the Liberty, and to an extent, you are correct. I still trust them more then I do any muslim country. Well, I guess I have absolute trust the muslims hate Israel and us. They do like our money though. I guess that is good for something.
 
so, are you saying I shouldn't invest in that new hot washer??????
This of it in a positive way ? If you buy the hot water skid on credit, ya may not have to worry about paying for it, if all this comes true.
 
Back
Top