Ron Paul Delegates

Ron Musgraves said:
Thats crazy, the problem is he will take GOP votes. Obama Gets elected again
Click to expand...

This is the primary. He can't take votes unless he goes independent after the primaries.

He could win. This strategy has worked in the past.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
 
He is the only Man that has stuck to his guns all the way thru his political career. He is also our only hope to save the country.
 
People are scared of change. They've been conditioned to believe that we can't live without all these agencies and benefits. My mom is scared he is going to bring all the troops home and the next day every country in the world will be at her doorstep with AK47's. She's also worried about her social security. I told her I'd give her double what social security is paying her now if she would just vote for him, but she's too scared of the Russians. Everybody is brainwashed.
 
... and it's serious change that this country is needing if it is to continue to be a 'super' power and not fall the way of Greece, Spain and Portugal - with existing (and recent) political and fiscal policies we can only delay the inevitable. The old adage of 'too big to fail' and 'the world needs us' does not balance the books, foster positive economic conditions or change domestic perceptions and outlooks. Some serious government downsizing and acceptance of personal responsibility is needed - whether the 'masses' like it or not, there is not much else that will kickstart an upward trend in production, output and GDP growth.

There are thousands of variables, but REAL change is needed... change that is beyond the typical GOP/Liberal remit.
 
Change is good, and many of Paul's ideas are wonderful, but he has absolutely no leadeship experience, and there is nothing in the constitution that allows him to do some of the things he is proposing. If congress doesn't work with him, he will not be able to get anything done, and we are not a government like so many countries, that if their house doesn't work, the president tosses them out, and tries again.
Personally, I think that the guy is a little crazy, but I really think that his strategy is to stay in the race long enough to be able to have a seat at the table to make some things happen, and have input on a VP pick.
We need someone with proven, major, leadership skills. Just my opinion.
 
Lets cut to the chase then - Lets compare The Constitution (U know, the Law of the Land that they swore an oath to) to each and every thing any of them have done and espouse and add up the score.
 
Nope. I also did not vote for Mitt last time around in the primaries. I don't see a better alternative at this time, and I do not believe it is wise to just not vote if there is a not a favorite.
 
Steven Button said:
... and it's serious change that this country is needing if it is to continue to be a 'super' power and not fall the way of Greece, Spain and Portugal - with existing (and recent) political and fiscal policies we can only delay the inevitable. The old adage of 'too big to fail' and 'the world needs us' does not balance the books, foster positive economic conditions or change domestic perceptions and outlooks. Some serious government downsizing and acceptance of personal responsibility is needed - whether the 'masses' like it or not, there is not much else that will kickstart an upward trend in production, output and GDP growth.

There are thousands of variables, but REAL change is needed... change that is beyond the typical GOP/Liberal remit.
Click to expand...
steven you might be one of the smartest s.o.b's I have ever met. Time and time again your points are dead on!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top